↓ Skip to main content

DNA methylation age in paired tumor and adjacent normal breast tissue in Chinese women with breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epigenetics, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA methylation age in paired tumor and adjacent normal breast tissue in Chinese women with breast cancer
Published in
Clinical Epigenetics, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13148-023-01465-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hela Koka, Clara Bodelon, Steve Horvath, Priscilla Ming Yi Lee, Difei Wang, Lei Song, Tongwu Zhang, Amber N. Hurson, Jennifer Lyn Guida, Bin Zhu, Maeve Bailey-Whyte, Feng Wang, Cherry Wu, Koon Ho Tsang, Yee-Kei Tsoi, W. C. Chan, Sze Hong Law, Ray Ka Wai Hung, Gary M. Tse, Karen Ka-wan Yuen, Eric Karlins, Kristine Jones, Aurelie Vogt, Bin Zhu, Amy Hutchinson, Belynda Hicks, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Stephen Chanock, Jill Barnholtz-Sloan, Lap Ah Tse, Xiaohong R. Yang

Abstract

Few studies have examined epigenetic age acceleration (AA), the difference between DNA methylation (DNAm) predicted age and chronological age, in relation to somatic genomic features in paired cancer and normal tissue, with less work done in non-European populations. In this study, we aimed to examine DNAm age and its associations with breast cancer risk factors, subtypes, somatic genomic profiles including mutation and copy number alterations and other aging markers in breast tissue of Chinese breast cancer (BC) patients from Hong Kong. We performed genome-wide DNA methylation profiling of 196 tumor and 188 paired adjacent normal tissue collected from Chinese BC patients in Hong Kong (HKBC) using Illumina MethylationEPIC array. The DNAm age was calculated using Horvath's pan-tissue clock model. Somatic genomic features were based on data from RNA sequencing (RNASeq), whole-exome sequencing (WES), and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Pearson's correlation (r), Kruskal-Wallis test, and regression models were used to estimate associations of DNAm AA with somatic features and breast cancer risk factors. DNAm age showed a stronger correlation with chronological age in normal (Pearson r = 0.78, P < 2.2e-16) than in tumor tissue (Pearson r = 0.31, P = 7.8e-06). Although overall DNAm age or AA did not vary significantly by tissue within the same individual, luminal A tumors exhibited increased DNAm AA (P = 0.004) while HER2-enriched/basal-like tumors exhibited markedly lower DNAm AA (P = < .0001) compared with paired normal tissue. Consistent with the subtype association, tumor DNAm AA was positively correlated with ESR1 (Pearson r = 0.39, P = 6.3e-06) and PGR (Pearson r = 0.36, P = 2.4e-05) gene expression. In line with this, we found that increasing DNAm AA was associated with higher body mass index (P = 0.039) and earlier age at menarche (P = 0.035), factors that are related to cumulative exposure to estrogen. In contrast, variables indicating extensive genomic instability, such as TP53 somatic mutations, high tumor mutation/copy number alteration burden, and homologous repair deficiency were associated with lower DNAm AA. Our findings provide additional insights into the complexity of breast tissue aging that is associated with the interaction of hormonal, genomic, and epigenetic mechanisms in an East Asian population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,114,540
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epigenetics
#599
of 1,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,584
of 424,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epigenetics
#16
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.