↓ Skip to main content

Occult intraocular aluminium foreign body causing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Occult intraocular aluminium foreign body causing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a case report
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12886-023-02881-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ling Zhang, Bin Chen, WeiMin He

Abstract

Ocular trauma is complex and varied, and some occult intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) can lead to uncommon symptoms and signs. We report a case of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (no obvious wound, no pain, no intraocular infection or other symptoms) caused by an occult intraocular aluminium foreign body, which could have been easily missed. A 42-year-old male presented to the outpatient department of our hospital complaining of fluttering black dots and decreased vision in his left eye that began 3 months earlier. He was diagnosed with "floaters" at a community hospital. He denied a history of ocular trauma or previous surgery. The cornea and lens of the left eye were clear. A small patch of pigmentation was noted in the temporal sclera. Fundoscopy revealed macula-off retinal detachment. After mydriasis, elliptical holes were seen in the peripheral retina at 2:30, and a suspicious hyperreflective strip was found under the anterior lip of the retina by Goldmann three-mirror contact lens examination; the strip was confirmed to be an IOFB by orbital CT. The IOFB was removed through pars plana vitrectomy without any complications. Unlike iron and copper IOFBs, aluminium IOFBs are more inert and more likely to be missed. For people with special occupations (construction workers, mechanics, etc.), when abnormal pigmentation of the sclera is found, the possibility of foreign bodies in the eye should be considered. In the process of disease diagnosis and treatment, it is necessary to ask for a detailed history, including occupation history and practice, and perform careful physical and targeted examinations. Such comprehensive analysis regarding the above information will minimize the chance of missed diagnosis.Awareness of occult IOFB in high risk occupations and prompt referral to a retinal surgeon is of outmost importance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 13%
Librarian 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#20,838,163
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#1,593
of 2,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,683
of 423,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#37
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,701 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.