You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction: Camels’ biological fluids contained nanobodies: promising avenue in cancer therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Cell International, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12935-023-02898-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nouf S. Al‑Numair, Abdulrahman Theyab, Faisal Alzahrani, Anwar M. Shams, Ibrahim O. Al‑Anazi, Atif Abdulwahab A. Oyouni, Osama M. Al‑Amer, Charalampos Mavromatis, Islam M. Saadeldin, Wed A. Abdali, Yousef M. Hawsawi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,928,519
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell International
#366
of 1,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,767
of 234,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell International
#16
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,864 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.