You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping ethical issues in the use of smart home health technologies to care for older persons: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-023-00898-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadine Andrea Felber, Yi Jiao (Angelina) Tian, Félix Pageau, Bernice Simone Elger, Tenzin Wangmo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 67% |
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,941,043
of 23,746,606 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#192
of 1,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,448
of 391,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,746,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.