↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Retraction: Effect of controlled and uncontrolled cooling rate on motility parameters of cryopreserved ram spermatozoa

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Retraction: Effect of controlled and uncontrolled cooling rate on motility parameters of cryopreserved ram spermatozoa
Published in
BMC Research Notes, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-319
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iraj Ashrafi, Hamid Kohram, Hamid Naijan, Majid Bahreini, Hamid Mirzakhani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 33%
Librarian 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 33%
Design 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,638,651
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#348
of 4,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,765
of 164,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#8
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.