↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
218 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-6-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bogdan Beirowski, Robert Adalbert, Diana Wagner, Daniela S Grumme, Klaus Addicks, Richard R Ribchester, Michael P Coleman

Abstract

The progressive nature of Wallerian degeneration has long been controversial. Conflicting reports that distal stumps of injured axons degenerate anterogradely, retrogradely, or simultaneously are based on statistical observations at discontinuous locations within the nerve, without observing any single axon at two distant points. As axon degeneration is asynchronous, there are clear advantages to longitudinal studies of individual degenerating axons. We recently validated the study of Wallerian degeneration using yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in a small, representative population of axons, which greatly improves longitudinal imaging. Here, we apply this method to study the progressive nature of Wallerian degeneration in both wild-type and slow Wallerian degeneration (WldS) mutant mice.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 224 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 20%
Researcher 39 17%
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 14%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 28 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 32%
Neuroscience 41 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 10%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 36 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,623,723
of 19,164,538 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#115
of 1,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,788
of 167,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,164,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them