You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An optimized workflow for MS-based quantitative proteomics of challenging clinical bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Proteomics, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12014-023-09404-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Danielle O. Weise, Monica E. Kruk, LeeAnn Higgins, Todd W. Markowski, Pratik D. Jagtap, Subina Mehta, Alan Mickelson, Laurie L. Parker, Christine H. Wendt, Timothy J. Griffin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 45% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 55% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#17,474,940
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#214
of 339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,616
of 422,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.