You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Coughing correlates: insights into an innovative study using cough peak expiratory flow to predict extubation failure
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1574-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chuan Jiang, Antonio M. Esquinas, Bushra Mina |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 6 | 16% |
Argentina | 3 | 8% |
Mexico | 3 | 8% |
Colombia | 2 | 5% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 5% |
Uruguay | 2 | 5% |
Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
Grenada | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 79% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 16% |
Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 18% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 35% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,093,238
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#878
of 6,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,088
of 432,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#13
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.