↓ Skip to main content

Global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among physiotherapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among physiotherapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12891-023-06345-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe Gorce, Julien Jacquier-Bret

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are one of the most important problems among physiotherapists worldwide. However, there is no meta-analysis of the MSD prevalence in all body areas among physiotherapists. The purpose was to investigate and estimate the worldwide prevalence of MSD among physiotherapists using a systematic review-, meta-analysis and meta-regression. The systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed in 2022 using the PRISMA guidelines. The search was performed on PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Medeley and Science.gov databases. The quality appraisal of the included articles was assessed using the critical appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies AXIS. A total of 722 articles were found. After screening and comparison with the inclusion criteria, 26 studies were retained. Based on the random-effects model, the worldwide MSD prevalence in neck, upper back, mid back, lower back, shoulders, elbows, wrists/hands, thumb, hips/thighs, knees/legs, and ankles/feet was 26.4% (CI 95%: 21.0-31.9%), 17.7% (CI 95%: 13.2-22.2%), 14.9% (CI 95%: 7.7-22.1%), 40.1% (CI 95%: 32.2-48.0%), 20.8% (CI 95%: 16.5-25.1), 7.0% (CI 95%: 5.2-8.9), 18.1% (CI 95%: 14.7-21.5%), 35.4% (CI 95%: 23.0-47.8), 7.0% (CI 95%: 5.2-8.8), 13.0% (CI 95%: 10.3-15.8), and 5% (CI 95%: 4.0-6.9) respectively. The neck and shoulder prevalence of four continents were close to the world prevalence. No effect of continent was found on MSD prevalence. The heterogeneity of the results obtained in the meta-analysis and meta-regression was discussed. Based on the random effects model, the results of the worldwide meta-analysis showed that lower back pain, thumb, neck and shoulder were the area most at risk for MSD and were therefore those to be monitored as a priority. Recommendations were proposed for future reviews and meta-analyses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Master 5 11%
Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 23 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 25 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2023.
All research outputs
#13,433,507
of 23,863,389 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,796
of 4,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,694
of 408,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#26
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,863,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.