You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improving prioritization processes for clinical practice guidelines: new methods and an evaluation from the National Heart Foundation of Australia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12961-022-00953-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Brooke Atkins, Tom Briffa, Cia Connell, Amanda K. Buttery, Garry L. R. Jennings |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | 38% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
Ireland | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 20% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,696,864
of 25,376,646 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#791
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,277
of 411,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,376,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.