You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum to: Promise of combined hydrothermal/chemical and mechanical refining for pretreatment of woody and herbaceous biomass
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13068-016-0643-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sun Min Kim, Sun Min Kim, Bruce S. Dien, Vijay Singh |
| Abstract |
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0505-2.]. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#15,689,396
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#904
of 1,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,555
of 422,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#25
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,468 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.