You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of accuracy of plain radiography in determining the Risser stage and identification of common sources of errors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13018-014-0101-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jae Hyuk Yang, Amit Wasudeo Bhandarkar, Seung Woo Suh, Jae Young Hong, Jin Ho Hwang, Chang Hwa Ham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 44% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 17% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,729,051
of 23,504,791 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#337
of 1,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,889
of 366,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,791 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,454 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.