↓ Skip to main content

Change in Pseudomonas aeruginosa prevalence in cystic fibrosis adults over time

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Change in Pseudomonas aeruginosa prevalence in cystic fibrosis adults over time
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12890-016-0333-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathew R. Crull, Kathleen J. Ramos, Ellen Caldwell, Nicole Mayer-Hamblett, Moira L. Aitken, Christopher H. Goss

Abstract

Little is known about risk factors for chronic and mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) adults, and whether the prevalence is changing. We employed a retrospective cohort to analyze data from a single adult CF center (2002 to 2012). Regression models were used to assess independent predictors and change in prevalence of chronic and mucoid Pa infection over time. The odds ratio of mucoid Pa infection was significantly less in individuals with better baseline lung function (OR 0.84,95%CI:0.77-0.92) and those diagnosed after the age of 25 (OR 0.21, 95%CI:0.05-0.95). The prevalence of chronic Pa and mucoid Pa decreased during the time interval. After adjusting for confounders, the observed decrease in chronic and mucoid Pa between 2002 and 2012 was no longer significant. The prevalence of chronic and mucoid Pa is decreasing. Larger studies are needed to confirm these regional trends and their significance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 8 12%
Other 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 15 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 12%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2016.
All research outputs
#15,557,505
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1,059
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,559
of 424,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#30
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.