↓ Skip to main content

CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β is required for satellite cell self-renewal

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Muscle, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β is required for satellite cell self-renewal
Published in
Skeletal Muscle, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13395-016-0112-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neena Lala-Tabbert, Hamood AlSudais, François Marchildon, Dechen Fu, Nadine Wiper-Bergeron

Abstract

Postnatal growth and repair of skeletal muscle relies upon a population of quiescent muscle precursor cells, called satellite cells that can be activated to proliferate and differentiate into new myofibers, as well as self-renew to replenish the satellite cell population. The balance between differentiation and self-renewal is critical to maintain muscle tissue homeostasis, and alterations in this equilibrium can lead to chronic muscle degeneration. The transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta (C/EBPβ) is expressed in Pax7(+) satellite cells of healthy muscle and is downregulated during myoblast differentiation. Persistent expression of C/EBPβ upregulates Pax7, inhibits MyoD, and blocks myogenic differentiation. Using genetic tools to conditionally abrogate C/EBPβ expression in Pax7(+) cells, we examined the role of C/EBPβ in self-renewal of satellite cells during muscle regeneration. We find that loss of C/EBPβ leads to precocious differentiation at the expense of self-renewal in primary myoblast and myofiber cultures. After a single muscle injury, C/EBPβ-deficient satellite cells fail to self-renew resulting in a reduction of satellite cells available for future rounds of regeneration. After a second round of injury, muscle regeneration is impaired in C/EBPβ conditional knockout mice compared to wild-type control mice. We find that C/EBPβ can regulate Notch2 expression and that restoration of Notch activity in myoblasts lacking C/EBPβ prevents precocious differentiation. These findings demonstrate that C/EBPβ is a novel regulator of satellite cell self-renewal during muscle regeneration acting at least in part through Notch2.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 38%
Student > Master 5 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,455,251
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Muscle
#190
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,484
of 422,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Muscle
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.