↓ Skip to main content

The effect of activity-based financing on hospital length of stay for elderly patients suffering from heart diseases in Norway

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of activity-based financing on hospital length of stay for elderly patients suffering from heart diseases in Norway
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Yin, Hilde Lurås, Terje P Hagen, Fredrik A Dahl

Abstract

Whether activity-based financing of hospitals creates incentives to treat more patients and to reduce the length of each hospital stay is an empirical question that needs investigation. This paper examines how the level of the activity-based component in the financing system of Norwegian hospitals influences the average length of hospital stays for elderly patients suffering from ischemic heart diseases. During the study period, the activity-based component changed several times due to political decisions at the national level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Nigeria 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 34%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 9%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2013.
All research outputs
#12,876,153
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,284
of 7,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,465
of 193,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#64
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.