↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive benchmark and architectural analysis of deep learning models for nanopore sequencing basecalling

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
54 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive benchmark and architectural analysis of deep learning models for nanopore sequencing basecalling
Published in
Genome Biology, April 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13059-023-02903-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Pagès-Gallego, Jeroen de Ridder

Abstract

Nanopore-based DNA sequencing relies on basecalling the electric current signal. Basecalling requires neural networks to achieve competitive accuracies. To improve sequencing accuracy further, new models are continuously proposed with new architectures. However, benchmarking is currently not standardized, and evaluation metrics and datasets used are defined on a per publication basis, impeding progress in the field. This makes it impossible to distinguish data from model driven improvements. To standardize the process of benchmarking, we unified existing benchmarking datasets and defined a rigorous set of evaluation metrics. We benchmarked the latest seven basecaller models by recreating and analyzing their neural network architectures. Our results show that overall Bonito's architecture is the best for basecalling. We find, however, that species bias in training can have a large impact on performance. Our comprehensive evaluation of 90 novel architectures demonstrates that different models excel at reducing different types of errors and using recurrent neural networks (long short-term memory) and a conditional random field decoder are the main drivers of high performing models. We believe that our work can facilitate the benchmarking of new basecaller tools and that the community can further expand on this work.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 17 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 19%
Computer Science 6 13%
Unspecified 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 17 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,444,376
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,140
of 4,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,707
of 421,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#21
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.