You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Decentralized clinical trials and rare diseases: a Drug Information Association Innovative Design Scientific Working Group (DIA-IDSWG) perspective
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13023-023-02693-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mercedeh Ghadessi, Junrui Di, Chenkun Wang, Kiichiro Toyoizumi, Nan Shao, Chaoqun Mei, Charmaine Demanuele, Rui (Sammi) Tang, Gianna McMillan, Robert A. Beckman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 67% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 19% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 12% |
Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 15 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,612,988
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#176
of 3,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,838
of 423,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#4
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.