↓ Skip to main content

Global longitudinal strain: a useful everyday measurement?

Overview of attention for article published in Echo Research & Practice, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global longitudinal strain: a useful everyday measurement?
Published in
Echo Research & Practice, October 2016
DOI 10.1530/erp-16-0022
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. King, J. Thambyrajah, E. Leng, M. J. Stewart

Abstract

Herceptin (Trastuzumab) is a widely used and effective drug for the treatment of Her2+ breast cancer but its cardiotoxic side effects require regular monitoring by echocardiography. A 10% reduction in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction can lead to suspension of treatment and therefore has significant implications for patient prognosis in terms of cardiac and cancer outcomes. Assessment of LV function by conventional 2D biplane method of disks (2DEF) has limitations in accuracy and reproducibility. Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) is becoming more widely available and user friendly. It has been shown to demonstrate myocardial damage earlier in treatment than 2DEF allowing theoption of pharmacological intervention at a pre-clinical stage and preventing the interruption of Herceptin. This study compares the reproducibility of GLS with that of 2DEF in a routine clinical environment. 50 echocardiograms performed on female patients undergoing Herceptin treatment were used to measure both 2DEF and GLS within the recommended standard appointment time of 40 mins. The data was re-measured (blind) by the same operator a minimum of 14 days later to determine intra-operator variation. This data was also measured by a second operator (blind), to assess inter-operator variation. Analysis by direct comparison, Intra-class correlation (ICC), Co-efficient Variation (CV) and Bland Altman plots demonstrated that GLS is a more reproducible measurement than 2DEF. This is important to prevent clinical decisions being erroneously based on variation in operator measurement. The investigation also shows that with advances in machine software this is a practical addition to routine assessment rather than merely a research tool.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 34%
Engineering 6 8%
Psychology 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 29 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,965,122
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Echo Research & Practice
#155
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,638
of 332,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Echo Research & Practice
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.