You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Engineering Cupriavidus necator H16 for enhanced lithoautotrophic poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) production from CO2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbial Cell Factories, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12934-022-01962-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Soyoung Kim, Yong Jae Jang, Gyeongtaek Gong, Sun-Mi Lee, Youngsoon Um, Kyoung Heon Kim, Ja Kyong Ko |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,354,734
of 23,572,442 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#233
of 1,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,735
of 445,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#5
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,663 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.