You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dose-response association between dietary folate and niacin intakes with diabetes among Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41043-023-00362-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuhong Jiang, Zhiwen Zhang, Yi Zhu, Yongfei Chai, Hong Xie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 26% |
India | 1 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
Austria | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,632,014
of 25,930,295 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition
#84
of 658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,542
of 425,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.