↓ Skip to main content

The housing first model (HFM) fidelity index: designing and testing a tool for measuring integrity of housing programs that serve active substance users

Overview of attention for article published in Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The housing first model (HFM) fidelity index: designing and testing a tool for measuring integrity of housing programs that serve active substance users
Published in
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1747-597x-8-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dennis P Watson, John Orwat, Dana E Wagner, Valery Shuman, Randi Tolliver

Abstract

The Housing First Model (HFM) is an approach to serving formerly homeless individuals with dually diagnosed mental health and substance use disorders regardless of their choice to use substances or engage in other risky behaviors. The model has been widely diffused across the United States since 2000 as a result of positive findings related to consumer outcomes. However, a lack of clear fidelity guidelines has resulted in inconsistent implementation. The research team and their community partner collaborated to develop a HFM Fidelity Index. We describe the instrument development process and present results from its initial testing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 129 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 20%
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 48 36%
Psychology 17 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 26 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,142,473
of 23,784,266 outputs
Outputs from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#385
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,281
of 194,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,784,266 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.