You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of a stress coping strategy on perceived stress levels and performance during a simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Emergency Medicine, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-227x-13-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabina Hunziker, Simona Pagani, Katrin Fasler, Franziska Tschan, Norbert K Semmer, Stephan Marsch |
| Abstract |
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) causes significant stress for the rescuers which may cause deficiencies in attention and increase distractibility. This may lead to misjudgements of priorities and delays in CPR performance, which may further increase mental stress (vicious cycle). This study assessed the impact of a task-focusing strategy on perceived stress levels and performance during a simulated CPR scenario. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 18% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 21% |
| Unknown | 44 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 29% |
| Psychology | 26 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 53 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2013.
All research outputs
#6,823,473
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#285
of 746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,308
of 196,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.