↓ Skip to main content

User fee exemption and malaria treatment-seeking for children under five in a Cameroonian health district: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
User fee exemption and malaria treatment-seeking for children under five in a Cameroonian health district: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12936-023-04509-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rolf Nyah Tuku Nzalie, John Ngunde Palle, Dickson Shey Nsagha

Abstract

In Cameroon, malaria contributes significantly to the morbidity and mortality of children under 5 years old. In order to encourage adequate treatment-seeking in health facilities, user fee exemptions for malaria treatment have been instituted. However, many children are still brought to health facilities in the late stage of severe malaria. This study sought to determine the factors affecting the hospital treatment-seeking time of guardians of children under 5 years within the context of this user fee exemption. This was a cross-sectional study conducted at three randomly selected health facilities of the Buea Health District. A pre-tested questionnaire was used to collect data on the treatment-seeking behaviour and time of guardians, as well as potential predictors of this time. Hospital treatment sought after 24 h of noticing symptoms was denoted as delayed. Continuous variables were described using medians while categorical variables were described using percentages. A multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the factors affecting malaria treatment-seeking time of guardians. All statistical tests were done at a 95% confidence interval. Most of the guardians made use of pre-hospital treatments, with self-medication being practiced by 39.7% (95% CI 35.1-44.3%) of them. A total of 193 (49.5%) guardians delayed seeking treatment at health facilities. Reasons for delay included financial constraints and watchful waiting at home, during which guardians waited and hoped their child could get better without requiring medicines. Guardians with estimated monthly household incomes denoted as low/middle were significantly more likely (AOR 3.794; 95% CI 2.125-6.774) to delay seeking hospital treatment. The occupation of guardians was another significant determinant of treatment-seeking time (AOR 0.042; 95% CI 0.003-0.607). Also, guardians with tertiary education were less likely (AOR 0.315; 95% CI 0.107-0.927) to delay seeking hospital treatment. This study suggests that despite user fee exemption, other factors such as educational and income levels of guardians affect malaria treatment-seeking time for children aged under five. Therefore, these factors should be considered when enacting policies aimed at increasing access of children to health facilities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2023.
All research outputs
#15,867,217
of 23,572,509 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,528
of 5,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,619
of 254,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#54
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.