↓ Skip to main content

Molecular cloning of doublesex genes of four cladocera (water flea) species

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular cloning of doublesex genes of four cladocera (water flea) species
Published in
BMC Genomics, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-239
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenji Toyota, Yasuhiko Kato, Masaru Sato, Naomi Sugiura, Shinichi Miyagawa, Hitoshi Miyakawa, Hajime Watanabe, Shigeto Oda, Yukiko Ogino, Chizue Hiruta, Takeshi Mizutani, Norihisa Tatarazako, Susanne Paland, Craig Jackson, John K Colbourne, Taisen Iguchi

Abstract

The gene doublesex (dsx) is known as a key factor regulating genetic sex determination in many organisms. We previously identified two dsx genes (DapmaDsx1 and DapmaDsx2) from a freshwater branchiopod crustacean, Daphnia magna, which are expressed in males but not in females. D. magna produces males by parthenogenesis in response to environmental cues (environmental sex determination) and we showed that DapmaDsx1 expression during embryonic stages is responsible for the male trait development. The D. magna dsx genes are thought to have arisen by a cladoceran-specific duplication; therefore, to investigate evolutionary conservation of sex specific expression of dsx genes and to further assess their functions in the environmental sex determination, we searched for dsx homologs in four closely related cladoceran species.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 78 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 18%
Environmental Science 13 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,192,189
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#9,248
of 10,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,105
of 199,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#109
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.