↓ Skip to main content

Modelling of inquiry diagnosis for coronary heart disease in traditional Chinese medicine by using multi-label learning

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modelling of inquiry diagnosis for coronary heart disease in traditional Chinese medicine by using multi-label learning
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-10-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guo-Ping Liu, Guo-Zheng Li, Ya-Lei Wang, Yi-Qin Wang

Abstract

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a common cardiovascular disease that is extremely harmful to humans. In Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), the diagnosis and treatment of CHD have a long history and ample experience. However, the non-standard inquiry information influences the diagnosis and treatment in TCM to a certain extent. In this paper, we study the standardization of inquiry information in the diagnosis of CHD and design a diagnostic model to provide methodological reference for the construction of quantization diagnosis for syndromes of CHD. In the diagnosis of CHD in TCM, there could be several patterns of syndromes for one patient, while the conventional single label data mining techniques could only build one model at a time. Here a novel multi-label learning (MLL) technique is explored to solve this problem.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 11 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Computer Science 9 24%
Engineering 3 8%
Mathematics 2 5%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2013.
All research outputs
#17,687,671
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2,333
of 3,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,160
of 94,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#18
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.