You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
AllerGen’s 8th research conference
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13223-016-0164-7 |
| Authors |
Marie-Claire Arrieta, Andrea Arevalos, Leah Stiemsma, Marta E. Chico, Carlos Sandoval, Minglian Jin, Jens Walter, Phil Cooper, Brett Finlay, Emilie Bernatchez, Matthew J. Gold, Anick Langlois, Pascale Blais-Lecours, Caroline Duchaine, David Marsolais, Kelly M. McNagny, Marie-Renée Blanchet, Jordan Brubacher, Bimal Chhetri, Kelly Sabaliauskas, Kate Bassil, Jeff Kwong, Frances Coates, Tim K. Takaro, Angela Chow, Gregory E. Miller, Edith Chen, Piushkumar J. Mandhane, Stuart E. Turvey, Susan J. Elliott, Allan B. Becker, Padmaja Subbarao, Malcolm R. Sears, Anita L. Kozyrskyj, Aimée Dubeau, Zihang Lu, Susan Balkovec, Krzysztof Kowalik, Per Gustafsson, Felix Ratjen, Rachel D. Edgar, Nicole R. Bush, Julie L. MacIssac, Lisa M. McEwen, Thomas W. Boyce, Michael S. Kobor, Melanie Emmerson, Aimée Dubeau, Zihang Lu, Bingqing Shen, Krzysztof Kowalik, Felix Ratjen, Theo J. Moraes, Sofianne Gabrielli, Ann Clarke, Harley Eisman, Judy Morris, Lawrence Joseph, Sebastien LaVieille, Moshe Ben-Shoshan, Sumaiya A. Islam, Christof Brückmann, Vanessa Nieratschker, Kyla C. Jamieson, David Proud, Cynthia Kanagaratham, Pierre Camateros, Frantisek Kopriva, Jennifer Henri, Marian Hajduch, Danuta Radzioch, Liane J. Kang, Petya T. Koleva, Catherine J. Field, Tedd Konya, James A. Scott, Theodore Konya, Meghan B. Azad, Jeff Brook, David Guttman, CHILD Study Investigators, Manjeet Kumari, Sarah L. Bridgman, Mon H. Tun, Rupasri Mandal, David S. Wishart, Amy H. Y. Lee, Jeff Xia, Erin Gill, Bob Hancock, Danay Maestre, Darren Sutherland, Jeremy Hirota, Olga Pena, Christopher Carlsten, Lisa M. McEwen, Meaghan J. Jones, Julia L. MacIsaac, William H. Dow, Luis Rosero-Bixby, David H. Rehkopf, Takeshi Morimoto, Steven G. Smith, John-Paul Oliveria, Suzanne Beaudin, Abbey Schlatman, Karen Howie, Caitlin Obminski, Graeme Nusca, Roma Sehmi, Gail M. Gauvreau, Paul M. O’Byrne, Michelle North, Cheng Peng, Marco Sanchez-Guerra, Hyang-Min Byun, Anne K. Ellis, Andrea A. Baccarelli, Joseph O. Okeme, Suman Dhal, Aman Saini, Miriam L. Diamond, Christopher J. Olesovsky, Brittany M. Salter, Michael Wang, Paige Lacy, Michael J. O’Sullivan, Chan Y. Park, Jeffrey J. Fredberg, Anne-Marie Lauzon, James G. Martin, Min Hyung Ryu, Neeloffer Mookherjee, Christopher Carlsten, Elinor Simons, Diana Lefebvre, David Dai, Amrit Singh, Casey P. Shannon, Young Woong Kim, Chen Xi Yang, J. Mark FitzGerald, Louis-Philippe Boulet, Scott J. Tebbutt, Gurpreet K. Singhera, S. JasemineYang, Delbert R. Dorscheid, Hasantha Sinnock, Susan Goruk, Hamid Tavakoli, Larry D. Lynd, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Mark W. Tenn, Jenny Thiele, Daniel E. Adams, Lisa M. Steacy, Anne K. Ellis, Bahar Torabi, Sarah De Schryver, Duncan Lejtenyi, Ingrid Baerg, Edmond S. Chan, Bruce D. Mazer, Maxwell M. Tran, Wei Hao Dai, Wendy Lou, Radha S. Chari, CHILD Study Investigators, Edward M. Conway, Helen Neighbour, Mark Larché, Scott J Tebbutt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 34% |
| Engineering | 3 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,330,121
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#130
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,632
of 420,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.