↓ Skip to main content

Direct detection of alpha synuclein oligomers in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica Communications, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct detection of alpha synuclein oligomers in vivo
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/2051-5960-1-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hemi Dimant, Suneil K Kalia, Lorraine V Kalia, Liya N Zhu, Laura Kibuuka, Darius Ebrahimi-Fakhari, Nikolaus R McFarland, Zhanyun Fan, Bradley T Hyman, Pamela J McLean

Abstract

Rat models of Parkinson's disease are widely used to elucidate the mechanisms underlying disease etiology or to investigate therapeutic approaches. Models were developed using toxins such as MPTP or 6-OHDA to specifically target dopaminergic neurons resulting in acute neuronal loss in the substantia nigra or by using viral vectors to induce the specific and gradual expression of alpha synuclein in the substantia nigra. The detection of alpha- synuclein oligomers, the presumed toxic species, in these models and others has been possible using only indirect biochemical approaches to date. Here we coinjected AAVs encoding alpha-synuclein fused to the N- or C-terminal half of VenusYFP in rat substantia nigra pars compacta and describe for the first time a novel viral vector rodent model with the unique ability to directly detect and track alpha synuclein oligomers ex vivo and in vivo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 89 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 30%
Student > Master 16 17%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 20%
Neuroscience 10 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2013.
All research outputs
#18,338,946
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#1,223
of 1,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,458
of 193,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#17
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.