↓ Skip to main content

Evidence requirements of permanently listed digital health applications (DiGA) and their implementation in the German DiGA directory: an analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence requirements of permanently listed digital health applications (DiGA) and their implementation in the German DiGA directory: an analysis
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12913-023-09287-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie Mäder, Patrick Timpel, Tonio Schönfelder, Carsta Militzer-Horstmann, Sandy Scheibe, Ria Heinrich, Dennis Häckl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#16,600,382
of 25,214,112 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,066
of 8,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,472
of 402,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#111
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,214,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.