↓ Skip to main content

Pulp-to-palm distance after plate fixation of a distal radius fracture corresponds to functional outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physiotherapy, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pulp-to-palm distance after plate fixation of a distal radius fracture corresponds to functional outcome
Published in
Archives of Physiotherapy, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40945-023-00159-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugo Jakobsson, Eva Lundqvist, Per Wretenberg, Marcus Sagerfors

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2023.
All research outputs
#15,872,485
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physiotherapy
#128
of 147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,850
of 339,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physiotherapy
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.