You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction: Immune-mediated myogenesis and acetylcholine receptor clustering promote a slow disease progression in ALS mouse models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Inflammation and Regeneration, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41232-023-00276-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cassandra Margotta, Paola Fabbrizio, Marco Ceccanti, Chiara Cambieri, Gabriele Rufolo, Jessica D’Agostino, Maria Chiara Trolese, Pierangelo Cifelli, Veronica Alfano, Christian Laurini, Silvia Scaricamazza, Alberto Ferri, Gianni Sorarù, Eleonora Palma, Maurizio Inghilleri, Caterina Bendotti, Giovanni Nardo |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,840,893
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation and Regeneration
#51
of 258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,316
of 413,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation and Regeneration
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.