You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A prospective interventional study of recombinant human interleukin-11 mouthwash in chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Oral Health, July 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12903-022-02348-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hangping Wei, Juan Wei, Xiaofang Dong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,760,608
of 23,590,588 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#447
of 1,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,080
of 433,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#6
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,590,588 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.