You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Sepsis biomarkers: a review
Critical Care, January 2010
Charalampos Pierrakos, Jean-Louis Vincent
Biomarkers can be useful for identifying or ruling out sepsis, identifying patients who may benefit from specific therapies or assessing the response to therapy.
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||5||83%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||17%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||175||15%|
|Student > Master||132||11%|
|Student > Bachelor||118||10%|
|Student > Postgraduate||93||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||516||44%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||112||10%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||63||5%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||53||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2021.
All research outputs
of 24,122,534 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
of 6,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 170,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,122,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.