You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of gliadin-binding peptides by phage display
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Biotechnology, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6750-11-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tingsu Chen, Karolina Hoffmann, Sofia Östman, Ann-Sofie Sandberg, Olof Olsson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,760,608
of 23,592,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#434
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,309
of 107,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,592,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.