↓ Skip to main content

The relation between serum lipids and lutein and zeaxanthin in the serum and retina: results from cross-sectional, case-control and case study designs

Overview of attention for article published in Lipids in Health and Disease, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The relation between serum lipids and lutein and zeaxanthin in the serum and retina: results from cross-sectional, case-control and case study designs
Published in
Lipids in Health and Disease, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1476-511x-11-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa M Renzi, Billy R Hammond, Melissa Dengler, Richard Roberts

Abstract

The xanthophyll carotenoids lutein (L) and zeaxanthin (Z) are found in and around the macula of the primate retina, where they are termed macular pigment (MP). Dietary L and Z are absorbed with fat in the gut and transported on lipoproteins to the retina. Both MP and serum lipoproteins have been related to risk for neurodegenerative diseases such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD). L and Z are carried on both HDL (related to reduced risk of AMD) and LDL (related to increased risk). The purpose of this set of studies was to analyze the relation between L and Z in the serum and retina with the circulating lipid profile.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 23%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2017.
All research outputs
#13,409,217
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Lipids in Health and Disease
#607
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,109
of 156,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids in Health and Disease
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.