You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of the 2010 and 2019 diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) in two cohorts of Swedish older adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12877-021-02533-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ola Wallengren, Ingvar Bosaeus, Kerstin Frändin, Lauren Lissner, Hanna Falk Erhag, Hanna Wetterberg, Therese Rydberg Sterner, Lina Rydén, Elisabet Rothenberg, Ingmar Skoog |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Researcher | 4 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 28 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 22% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 6% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 30 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,186,032
of 23,604,080 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#203
of 3,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,527
of 441,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#6
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,604,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.