↓ Skip to main content

CRISPR-Cas-Docker: web-based in silico docking and machine learning-based classification of crRNAs with Cas proteins

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CRISPR-Cas-Docker: web-based in silico docking and machine learning-based classification of crRNAs with Cas proteins
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12859-023-05296-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ho-min Park, Jongbum Won, Yunseol Park, Esla Timothy Anzaku, Joris Vankerschaver, Arnout Van Messem, Wesley De Neve, Hyunjin Shim

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas-Docker is a web server for in silico docking experiments with CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) and Cas proteins. This web server aims at providing experimentalists with the optimal crRNA-Cas pair predicted computationally when prokaryotic genomes have multiple CRISPR arrays and Cas systems, as frequently observed in metagenomic data. CRISPR-Cas-Docker provides two methods to predict the optimal Cas protein given a particular crRNA sequence: a structure-based method (in silico docking) and a sequence-based method (machine learning classification). For the structure-based method, users can either provide experimentally determined 3D structures of these macromolecules or use an integrated pipeline to generate 3D-predicted structures for in silico docking experiments. CRISPR-Cas-Docker addresses the need of the CRISPR-Cas community to predict RNA-protein interactions in silico by optimizing multiple stages of computation and evaluation, specifically for CRISPR-Cas systems. CRISPR-Cas-Docker is available at www.crisprcasdocker.org as a web server, and at https://github.com/hshimlab/CRISPR-Cas-Docker as an open-source tool.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 6 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,173,107
of 24,900,093 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,612
of 7,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,338
of 395,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#45
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,900,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.