↓ Skip to main content

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors γ/mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 signaling protects against seizure-induced neuronal cell death in the hippocampus following experimental status…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors γ/mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 signaling protects against seizure-induced neuronal cell death in the hippocampus following experimental status epilepticus
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1742-2094-9-184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yao-Chung Chuang, Tsu-Kung Lin, Hsuan-Ying Huang, Wen-Neng Chang, Chia-Wei Liou, Shang-Der Chen, Alice YW Chang, Samuel HH Chan

Abstract

Status epilepticus induces subcellular changes that may lead to neuronal cell death in the hippocampus. However, the mechanism of seizure-induced neuronal cell death remains unclear. The mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) is expressed in selected regions of the brain and is emerged as an endogenous neuroprotective molecule in many neurological disorders. We evaluated the neuroprotective role of UCP2 against seizure-induced hippocampal neuronal cell death under experimental status epilepticus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 20 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2023.
All research outputs
#16,691,489
of 25,337,969 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,914
of 2,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,162
of 170,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#39
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,337,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.