↓ Skip to main content

Origin of oligodendrocytes in mammalian forebrains: a revised perspective

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Physiological Sciences, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Origin of oligodendrocytes in mammalian forebrains: a revised perspective
Published in
The Journal of Physiological Sciences, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12576-016-0479-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masae Naruse, Yasuki Ishizaki, Kazuhiro Ikenaka, Aoi Tanaka, Seiji Hitoshi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 27 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,310,239
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#97
of 501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,919
of 354,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.