You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coronas of micro/nano plastics: a key determinant in their risk assessments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12989-022-00492-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiayu Cao, Qing Yang, Jie Jiang, Tatenda Dalu, Aliaksei Kadushkin, Joginder Singh, Rawil Fakhrullin, Fangjun Wang, Xiaoming Cai, Ruibin Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 49 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 9 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 55 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,495,743
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#49
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,029
of 433,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.