You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of the Propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios in case of small sample size
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-12-70 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Romain Pirracchio, Matthieu Resche-Rigon, Sylvie Chevret |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 21% |
| Researcher | 38 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 15 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 25% |
| Unknown | 31 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,346,889
of 23,900,102 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,081
of 2,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,592
of 167,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,900,102 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.