You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Simple screening statistical tools to detect reporting bias: when should we ask for raw data?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc12611 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Romain Pirracchio, Matthieu Resche-Rigon, Sylvie Chevret, Didier Journois |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | 57% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 4 | 24% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
Other | 4 | 24% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 59% |
Engineering | 2 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2013.
All research outputs
#7,198,095
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,992
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,695
of 205,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#53
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.