You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The origin of cost–benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, November 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12962-021-00330-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wei Jiang, Rainer Marggraf |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Researcher | 4 | 5% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 38 | 51% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 12% |
Engineering | 5 | 7% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 40 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,778,844
of 23,636,051 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#229
of 438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,798
of 515,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,636,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.