You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spontaneous and cued gaze-following in autism and Williams syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1866-1955-5-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah M Riby, Peter JB Hancock, Nicola Jones, Mary Hanley |
| Abstract |
From a young age the typical development of social functioning relies upon the allocation of attention to socially relevant information, which in turn allows experience at processing such information and thus enhances social cognition. As such, research has attempted to identify the developmental processes that are derailed in some neuro-developmental disorders that impact upon social functioning. Williams syndrome (WS) and autism are disorders of development that are characterized by atypical yet divergent social phenotypes and atypicalities of attention to people. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 38% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 73 | 49% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2013.
All research outputs
#2,800,211
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#104
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,063
of 206,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.