You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
CRISPR-Cas13a-powered electrochemical biosensor for the detection of the L452R mutation in clinical samples of SARS-CoV-2 variants
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12951-023-01903-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhi Chen, Chenshuo Wu, Yuxuan Yuan, Zhongjian Xie, Tianzhong Li, Hao Huang, Shuang Li, Jiefeng Deng, Huiling Lin, Zhe Shi, Chaozhou Li, Yabin Hao, Yuxuan Tang, Yuehua You, Omar A. Al-Hartomy, Swelm Wageh, Abdullah G. Al-Sehemi, Ruitao Lu, Ling Zhang, Xuechun Lin, Yaqing He, Guojun Zhao, Defa Li, Han Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 16 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 4 | 14% |
Chemical Engineering | 3 | 11% |
Engineering | 3 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,960,449
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#332
of 2,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,962
of 413,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#6
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,028 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.