↓ Skip to main content

Molecular investigation of malaria-infected patients in Djibouti city (2018–2021)

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular investigation of malaria-infected patients in Djibouti city (2018–2021)
Published in
Malaria Journal, May 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12936-023-04546-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rahma Abdi Moussa, Nasserdine Papa Mze, Houssein Yonis Arreh, Aicha Abdillahi Hamoud, Kahiya Mohamed Alaleh, Abdoul-Razak Yonis Omar, Warsama Osman Abdi, Samatar Kayad Guelleh, Abdoul-Ilah Ahmed Abdi, Mohamed Houmed Aboubaker, Leonardo K. Basco, Bouh Abdi Khaireh, Hervé Bogreau

Abstract

The Republic of Djibouti is a malaria endemic country that was in pre-elimination phase in 2006-2012. From 2013, however, malaria has re-emerged in the country, and its prevalence has been increasing every year. Given the co-circulation of several infectious agents in the country, the assessment of malaria infection based on microscopy or histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)-based rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) has shown its limitations. This study, therefore, aimed to assess the prevalence of malaria among febrile patients in Djibouti city using more robust molecular tools. All suspected malaria cases reported to be microscopy-positive were randomly sampled (n = 1113) and included in four health structures in Djibouti city over a 4-year period (2018-2021), mainly during the malaria transmission season (January-May). Socio-demographic information was collected, and RDT was performed in most of the included patients. The diagnosis was confirmed by species-specific nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Data were analysed using Fisher's exact test and kappa statistics. In total, 1113 patients with suspected malaria and available blood samples were included. PCR confirmed that 788/1113 (70.8%) were positive for malaria. Among PCR-positive samples, 656 (83.2%) were due to Plasmodium falciparum, 88 (11.2%) Plasmodium vivax, and 44 (5.6%) P. falciparum/P. vivax mixed infections. In 2020, P. falciparum infections were confirmed by PCR in 50% (144/288) of negative RDTs. After the change of RDT in 2021, this percentage decreased to 17%. False negative RDT results were found more frequently (P < 0.05) in four districts of Djibouti city (Balbala, Quartier 7, Quartier 6, and Arhiba). Malaria occurred less frequently in regular bed net users than in non-users (odds ratio [OR]: 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-0.92). The present study confirmed the high prevalence of falciparum malaria and, to a lesser extent, vivax malaria. Nevertheless, 29% of suspected malaria cases were misdiagnosed by microscopy and/or RDT. There is a need to strengthen the capacity for diagnosis by microscopy and to evaluate the possible role of P. falciparum hrp2 gene deletion, which leads to false negative cases of P. falciparum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 9 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Unspecified 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#13,594,068
of 23,932,398 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,263
of 5,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,838
of 331,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#35
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,932,398 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.