You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical classification in mental health at the cross-roads: which direction next?
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-125 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ian B Hickie, Jan Scott, Daniel F Hermens, Elizabeth M Scott, Sharon L Naismith, Adam J Guastella, Nick Glozier, Patrick D McGorry |
Abstract |
After 30 years of consensus-derived diagnostic categories in mental health, it is time to head in new directions. Those categories placed great emphasis on enhanced reliability and the capacity to identify them via standardized checklists. Although this enhanced epidemiology and health services planning, it failed to link broad diagnostic groupings to underlying pathophysiology or specific treatment response. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 28% |
Netherlands | 2 | 11% |
Australia | 2 | 11% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 28% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 123 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
Other | 31 | 24% |
Unknown | 25 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 22% |
Psychology | 26 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 18% |
Unknown | 29 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#1,879,458
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,317
of 4,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,253
of 206,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#29
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.