You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of diaphragmatic ultrasound as a predictor of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-023-04430-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henry M. Parada-Gereda, Adriana L. Tibaduiza, Alejandro Rico-Mendoza, Daniel Molano-Franco, Victor H. Nieto, Wanderley A. Arias-Ortiz, Purificación Perez-Terán, Joan R. Masclans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 8 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 10% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Colombia | 3 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 13% |
| Scientists | 6 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 40% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#971,033
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#749
of 6,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,387
of 405,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#28
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.