↓ Skip to main content

Propensity score to detect baseline imbalance in cluster randomized trials: the role of the c-statistic

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Propensity score to detect baseline imbalance in cluster randomized trials: the role of the c-statistic
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12874-015-0100-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clémence Leyrat, Agnès Caille, Yohann Foucher, Bruno Giraudeau

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Student > Master 9 19%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 2 4%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 21%
Mathematics 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,804,385
of 23,692,259 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,138
of 2,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,899
of 398,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,692,259 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.