↓ Skip to main content

Medical student self-reported confidence in obstetrics and gynaecology: development of a core clinical competencies document

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medical student self-reported confidence in obstetrics and gynaecology: development of a core clinical competencies document
Published in
BMC Medical Education, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-62
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristen Pierides, Paul Duggan, Anna Chur-Hansen, Amaya Gilson

Abstract

Clinical competencies in obstetrics and gynaecology have not been clearly defined for Australian medical students, the growing numbers of which may impact clinical teaching. Our aim was to administer and validate a competencies list, for self-evaluation by medical students of their confidence to manage common clinical tasks in obstetrics and gynaecology; to evaluate students' views on course changes that may result from increasing class sizes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Master 7 11%
Other 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Professor 5 8%
Other 20 31%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 42%
Psychology 7 11%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2013.
All research outputs
#18,338,946
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,731
of 3,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,825
of 192,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#35
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.