You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pathobionts in the tumour microbiota predict survival following resection for colorectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-023-01518-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James L. Alexander, Joram M. Posma, Alasdair Scott, Liam Poynter, Sam E. Mason, M. Luisa Doria, Lili Herendi, Lauren Roberts, Julie A. K. McDonald, Simon Cameron, David J. Hughes, Vaclav Liska, Simona Susova, Pavel Soucek, Verena Horneffer-van der Sluis, Maria Gomez-Romero, Matthew R. Lewis, Lesley Hoyles, Andrew Woolston, David Cunningham, Ara Darzi, Marco Gerlinger, Robert Goldin, Zoltan Takats, Julian R. Marchesi, Julian Teare, James Kinross |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 43% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 25% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,038,644
of 25,248,299 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,298
of 1,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,671
of 390,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#46
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,248,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.